That’s What He Said

Brooks Bayne – Innovate, Iterate or Obliterate

Posted in Startups, Technology by wolfsbayne on August 27, 2008

It happens all the time. A business or a product fails, and we’re surprised by it. Still with us is the old-school holdover of your dad’s world and its view that the only viable product came from the innovators and the executive teams who groomed those innovators. Product development was king and customer development, if even discussed, was considered frivolous.

Recently, here in L.A., we had a very public example of the holdover giving us a wink. Andrew Warner, the creator of Mixergy, squeezed out a vid to publicly out his “failure” with Mixergy. I don’t know Andrew very well, but I do like his jackets. I don’t want to talk about Mixergy in the context of failure. My good friend and associate, Chris Gammill, danced with the ugly step-sister of failure here. I’d like to think that Andrew iterated and didn’t fail.

For this blog post, I’d like to draw attention to the balance between innovating and iterating. There will always be innovations. There will always be  iterations of those innovations. In my experience, where the disconnect occurs with many companies, but especially the smaller ones, is the lack of understanding of what drives iteration. You have the innovation, the idea, and you release to the world. Then what? You have to develop the customer, not only your idea.

I worked with a founder in my last company, who thought all development resources should be spent innovating with every release cycle. The problem with this is that the customer never gets a product revision that meets their needs. As soon as a product is released, the customer needs to be engaged. Period. The customer profile that you’ll need to engage is the early adopter and the evangelist. I don’t know if Andrew engaged those two types of customers, but I do know that many people in the community, including me, had no idea that Andrew was developing Mixergy to be a competitor to Evite.

When we create a product or service we get so focused we “can’t see the forest for the trees”. Even large companies deal with this problem. My friends at Microsoft, for example, refer to the “Redmond bubble”.

My challenge with understanding customer development started back in 1997 when I was a new CEO brought in to replace one of those old-schoolers who couldn’t execute in a new space. I recall trying to get beyond the standard projections in a spreadsheet to a real world method of meeting those projections. With a startup, in a new space, trying to crystal ball what you’re gonna do in 12 months, not to mention 3-5 years out, is usually an exercise in futility. Through research and experience I found that customer development was a missing component.

Most companies can’t effectively engage the early adopters and evangelists. If that’s the case, how can they then expect to cross the “chasm” that exists between those early customer types and the mainstream market? And if they can do neither, what’s the point of the projections?

I’d like to see more new companies and entrepreneurs demonstrate that they know how to engage and communicate with the early adopter and evangelists. Without those early customers you don’t have a business. Based on my experience, I’m certain most advisors, directors and investors don’t understand that engaging early adopters and evangelists requires a different method of engagement than crossing into the mainstream customer. Don’t assume this is understood – it usually isn’t. Most attention in the early stages is on the innovation.

Innovation has to be supplemented. This means greater transparency, communication and consideration of your customers.

Good luck, entrepreneurs!

Connect with me on twitter (@wolfsbayne) or at my blog (

Brooks Bayne

Post to TechZulu

3 Responses

Subscribe to comments with RSS.

  1. Andrew Warner said, on August 27, 2008 at 9:21 pm

    A blog post called “I Iterated” wouldn’t have gotten nearly as many hits as “I Failed.”

    Thanks for the compliment on the jackets.

    Hey, how about linking my name to I have to start owning my google search page:

  2. Baron Miller said, on September 1, 2008 at 10:45 pm

    Nice piece. I agree it’s important to view your early adopters as a part of your company. They may not have been at your brainstorm summit, where you wrote your first road map, but they bring the real feedback and direction which can help drive itself. It may also be a challenge to deal with “why aren’t you working with xxx” or “why doesn’t your app do this?”. If they had any idea how many people volunteer ideas – 1 in 4 in a circle of early adopters – it’s a natural desire to try to help.

  3. dc web designer said, on September 19, 2008 at 11:52 am

    I love it when people applie “the chasm” to their articles … it’s such an incredible and often undervalued observation to understand. I’d like to see you also apply “the tipping point” to “the chasm” seems as when a site or concept starts to catch fire, get traction, and gain momentum is when the tipping point takes effect and catapults products and concepts across that chasm. Knowwhatimean?

Leave a Reply to Baron Miller Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: